‘Last Man on Earth’s’ Kristen Schaal: Last Woman Carol Is Phil’s “Savior”

Last Man on Earth - H 2015

FOX

Behind every great man, there is an equally great woman — and, it appears, behind the slovenly and dejectedLast Man on Earth, there is an equally neurotic and optimistic Last Woman.

During new Fox comedy Last Man on Earth’s series premiere Sunday, viewers were shocked by the show’s first big reveal — while Will Forte’s Phil Miller was still technically the last man on Earth, he was not alone.

After a futile search for fellow survivors of a mysterious deadly plague that wiped out civilization, Phil Miller had finally reached the end of his rope. Despondent, devoid of any hope and committed to ending it all, Phil was just about to crash his speeding truck into a rock formation when he saw it — smoke from a fire and proof that someone else was out there.

Read more ‘Last Man on Earth’ TV Review

Enter Flight of the Conchords’ Kristen Schaal, whose offbeat and rules-obsessed Carol Pilbasian immediately clashed with Phil’s more hedonistic tendencies. Not quite the company he had hoped or expected, Phil now finds himself (reluctantly) engaged and headed for marriage in hopes of finally getting some restoring the population.

So what’s next for the last two people on Earth? The Hollywood Reporter caught up with Schaal to talk keeping secrets, her “loveable” character, where these two opposites go from here.

So the big twist of the premiere was that Phil Miller was the last man but not actually the last person on Earth. What was it like trying to keep that secret for so long?

Oh, it was really right up my alley. That’s sort of how I would always prefer to do things. [Laughs] It was fun go to a job that nobody knew about and I like keeping the surprise. It was great.

What was the reaction like when people found out? Were people shocked?

Yeah, a few friends, were like, “Whoa! I didn’t know you were in this! I had no idea you were in this!” And they were very excited.

So far, we’ve primarily seen this post-virus world through the eyes of Phil. How will we begin to see Carol’s point of view shine through? Where is she coming from in all of this?

You’ll get to know and love Carol more as the series continues. She is incredibly loveable and has a real sweetness to her, like an authentic sweet spot, and, like she said in the second episode, she knows there’s a good person inside of Phil and she’s determined to bring out the best person he can be. There’s something so, I don’t know, just the integrity of that. On one hand, it could seem like kind of controlling, but on the other hand, she’s kind of his savior because he is at the end of his rope. So, it’s nice to see that mission. Whether or not it’s misguided, it’s coming from a good place.

Carol seems to be very strict with maintaining certain rules of the world. How much of that controlling nature is part of her actual personality? Is it inherent to who she is or is it more of just her way of coping with this insane world?

Oh yeah. I think she definitely comes from — it is part of her personality. She does like to follow the rules, but I think because of the circumstances she’s definitely taken it up to the extreme — like Will did with Phil on the other side of the spectrum — with the grammar and with the stop signs and making sure everything is in order in a completely order-less world. Something fascinating too is that now that she has found another person, there is one of the most extreme control, a real power play happening here because they’re given a completely fresh slate to start all over. Who gets to call the shots? It’s kind of awesome to see, just to see that delicate dance going back and forth. Who gets to call the shots in a world that is completely all your own again? Carol is really fighting for control and she definitely probably didn’t have that control in the old world and she’s going to make sure she gets it now.

Read more ‘Last Man on Earth’ Creators on Appealing to Moms, ‘Hipster Friends’

As Phil notes in the episode, such an obsession with rules that no longer matter seems almost silly. Were you ever afraid that the audience may be turned off by that part of the character?

I’m always worried about whether or not my, the character that I play — because they’re always so offbeat — there’s always a worry of like, “OK, are they, I hope, I hope they’re likeable,” and I think with the writing too that Will did, I just trusted that it was going to be great. Also, I always take on a character too, like Mel from Flight of the Conchords, that you look there and you’re like, “Ugh, this woman is like, up in their business, and she’s like this and that” and I’m just like, “I’m going to make people love her. I’m going to find a way to love her no matter what,” because even those characters that are quirky and offbeat, you know, there’s something about them too that’s really even more vulnerable and that ‘s really fun to play with.

At the end of the premiere, Carol proposes that the two of them get married, to which, out of almost sheer desperation, Phil agrees. Being so obsessed with rules, how will Carol reconcile the fact that they don’t have the necessary officiant or witnesses?

Part of this episode is how Carol organizes the wedding and I’m pretty sure Carol is a justice of the peace.

With Phil and Carol at such opposite ends of the spectrum in their reactions to their world, will we see those two ever find a middle ground?

Oh, absolutely. These two characters are going to engage in a very, entertaining dance, a very unusual dance, because it’s such a unique show, that I’m very excited about.

We saw small little flashes back into the life before the virus. Will we see more flashbacks in upcoming episodes? Will we perhaps see Carol before the virus?

We might [see a few flashbacks], but no, there won’t be any Carol flashbacks, unfortunately. Only in your dreams, your own personal dreams. (Laughs.)

See more Broadcast TV’s Returning Shows 2015-16

But we will learn more about the virus? Will the audience see what life was like living through this obviously horrific experience or will the show simply keep moving forward in this era after the virus?

There will be a couple conversations here and there as the series goes on and maybe tiny hints drop, but it won’t be the main focus of what’s happening.

Having ruled out flashbacks with Carol, will we perhaps see some dream or fantasies? Perhaps with some of the other cast additions who have been announced like January Jones, Mel Rodriguez or Cleopatra Coleman?

She might, but you never know. These new cast members, they could be Phil and Carol’s offspring for all we know, just years in the future.

Speaking of the future, the show takes place in the year 2021. Will we see any sort of references to pop culture or other things from the years between now and then? How much is that future different from what we know now (aside from, you know, a virus wiping out the entire population)?

That was a cool point I was chatting about with Will. I think what’s cool about the series taking place in 2021 after this virus is that whatever is happening in our culture now, kind of got frozen there because once the virus happened and it started destroying our entire world, there wasn’t an opportunity to make new culture. So, our cultural references are all from now. There’s no new inventions or pop stars or television shows or movies that have happened between now and the time you see Phil and Carol because people were just in the midst of a horrific battle for survival.

With such an uneasy partnership slowly but steadily developing between Carol and Phil, what’s the one thing viewers can expect between the two of them in this upcoming episode?

Let’s just say that Phil still stinks. It’s not a great [tease], but it’s true. (Laughs.)

Last Man on Earth airs Sundays at 9:30 p.m. on Fox. Like the premiere? Curious to see how this all plays out? Sound off in the comments below.

Continue Reading

‘How to Get Away With Murder’ Creator Teases Killer Season Finale Reveal

How to Get Away With Murder S01E11 Still 2 - H 2015

ABC/Mitchell Haaseth

At long last, Annalise Keating (Viola Davis) and her students will finally get an answer to one of their biggest mysteries — but not without sparking a whole new set of questions first.

After a roaring year filled with murder, mayhem and nine little words, ABC’s How to Get Away With Murder wraps up its freshman year run Thursday at 9 p.m. with an action-packed two-hour finale and a reveal that’s been a season in the making: Who, actually, killed Lila Stangard?

While the deceased Sam (Tom Verica) has been heavily implicated in Lila’s slaughter, the penultimate episode threw a wrench into the situation, making it more complicated than ever. Driven by a growing mistrust in his relationship with Rebecca (Katie Findlay), Wes (Alfred Enoch) sought out his apartment’s former tenant, the mental institution-bound Rudy, and discovered that not only was he committed on the night of Lila’s slaying, but, upon seeing a picture of Rebecca, could finally open up with one word — “wet.”

What does this mean for the Keating Five? Can justice ever be served in the Murder world? What does this reveal mean for season two? The Hollywood Reporter caught up with series creator Pete Nowalk to answer these and other burning questions heading into Thursday’s two-hour season finale.

Read more ‘How to Get Away With Murder’s’ Cicely Tyson on Diversity, Playing Mom to Viola Davis

The season started with a murder (Lila) and a cover-up (allegedly, Sam), and the midseason finale had another murder (Sam) and a cover up (Annalise and the Keating cabal). Is it fair to expect we might see the pattern continue in the finale? Will the dominoes continue to fall?

In the finale, we definitely answer and show who killed Lila. And for the rest of the show, I don’t ever want there to be a pattern, except for the pattern of following the story, and you were correct in saying the dominoes have fallen. I think the first domino — well, I wonder if we’d even know what really the first domino was — one of them is Lila’s death and that sets our characters on a path that I want to keep following. I don’t want to be like, “We’re done with season one! Here’s a whole new thing for season two!” I want to follow, to me, what would be the real aftermath of what these characters went through in season one.

Who is in the most at danger of being the next one that falls? Who is the last one?

It’s definitely constantly being negotiated. From the episode that aired [last Thursday], Wes is really wearing the weight of the world on his shoulders. He got Rebecca signed on as Annalise’s client, and now he wonders if he was wrong the whole time. It’s a lot for a 26-year-old, innocent guy like Wes to carry around with him, and it blows up his world. He is really the person who we’re going to be following and feeling his shame about and also his terror that he got them all into this mess.

With so many mysteries and questions from throughout the season still up in the air, how many answers can viewers expect from the finale?

We’ll definitely give the audience a lot more answers. That’s always been our goal for all the things we set up in our pilot to really answer by the end of season one. What I’m really happy about is some of these answers do launch more questions and you’ll know exactly what I mean once you’ve seen it. And those are [questions] we’ll answer in season two. 

See more A Day in the Life of Shondaland MVP Tom Verica

But will there be some sort of justice served?

In terms of justice, Annalise has tried to instill in her students that for her, justice is very messy. It isn’t black and white. It’s extremely gray. The justice system is more of a game, and that’s the version of justice we’re going to see in the finale.

If it is all just a game, will there ever be a clear winner or a clear loser? Or is it just a constant back and forth of never knowing which side they are actually on?

I think it’s what you said last, you never know if you are winning or losing or even if you win, there’s a loss that goes along with that. There’s never the pure feeling of relief. I think that that will never be true for these characters no matter what. They’ve all killed a man, innocent or guilty, and no matter what, they will have to live with that for the rest of their lives, and that’s going to impact them in ways that could possibly ruin their lives.

Connor (Jack Falahee) has really been one of the breakout characters this season. What’s coming up for him in this final episode?

He has a big storyline in the finale with Oliver (Conrad Ricamora) and that’s the next step in their relationship. He’s also dealing with the fallout of Rudy, I’ll say, from the previous episode. He’s distracted by personal story throughout the first half of the finale before he really gets pulled into the saga that is Rebecca.

Speaking of Rebecca, it seems like she might have jumped Sam as the prime suspect in Lila’s death. With the true killer — Rebecca, Sam or otherwise — being exposed in this episode, how will that reveal lead the show into season two?

I don’t want to say too much one way or the other because I feel like it might spoil things, but I think all of the characters are left with questions

Before the midseason premiere, you said that it represented a bit of a “mini-reboot” of the series. Will we see the same sort of thing for season two?

I hope to always keep the show fresh. We just finished season one, so it’s not like I’ve mapped out all of season two yet (laughs), but for me, the goal is that we always do these — it’s always going to be about Annalise and a lot of these characters, but it’s our goal to keep it fresh so you guys don’t get bored and go, “Oh, we know where this is going.” That’s the fun part of the show and coming up with things that feel different. We’re going on a new journey.

See more Broadcast TV’s Returning Shows 2015-16

The Keating Five are now indelibly tied to Annalise because of their participation in the Murder Night. If each of the seasons is a new year or semester, how will we see these people continue to interact? Would it be fair to say that some people might not come back? Could there be new characters next year?

I’m not necessarily sure that each season will start with a new semester. Annalise works all year round and she’s not just a professor, especially with these students, whether they work for her or not or are in her class or not, they’re all tied to each other. She feels very protective of them, and I feel like they fell very protected by her. So, whether there are new characters or where the old characters go is all still to be determined.

With one murder mystery being wrapped up, will we ever see the characters get any true closure to the Sam/Murder Night story and move on to other murders, or will that continue to be the titular murder throughout the series? With her participation, can the show only end with some sort of conviction for Annalise?

No, I think there’s definitely other ways this can end, and we’ll see how long people keep watching and what we do with the story, but that’s all up in the air in. It’s our goal to come up with storylines that are left turns from where the audience thinks we’re going and whether that means less murders or more murders, it will be surprising. That’s what I know will give the audience more of a surprise.

Read more Broadcast TV Scorecard: Compete Guide to What’s New, Renewed and Canceled

Switching gears a bit, you’ve now arrived at the end of your first season as a showrunner. What are the biggest lessons you’ve learned through this process? How close does where you finished match with where you hoped to be at the start?

I’ve learned so much I can’t even begin to describe it but really what I’ve learned is to really act and think like an audience member. I think in that way, the things that I assumed would happen at the end of this season have changed because I’m reacting to what was in the previous episode before and things that I assumed were true, I felt like were too expected. It was always a job to be like, “Oh this is the expected thing, how do we turn this on its head?” So, for me as a storyteller, it’s really just being in the moment and in the current episode and learning to trust the instinct of what feels surprising and what feels real to the characters. And in that way it’s been nice in that you really can’t plan it all out, you just sort of go with your gut.

Curious who killed Lila? Wondering if they will actually get away with murder? Chime in with your theories and thoughts in the comments below. Stay tuned to THR‘s The Live Feed for more Murder scoop ahead of Thursday’s season finale. The Murder two-hour finale airs Thursday at 9 p.m.

Twitter: @NotPhelan

Continue Reading

‘How to Get Away With Murder’s’ Karla Souza: The Stakes Get Higher With a “Shocking Arrest”

How to Get Away With Murder Still - H 2015

ABC

The murderous students of Middleton University should have known better than to ignore the advice of Annalise Keating (Viola Davis).

Last week’s episode of ABC’s freshman hit How to Get Away With Murder found law school back in session and the Keating Five trying to move forward from the events of Murder Night. Well, that was until the twisty legal procedural dropped another bomb—Sam’s (Tom Verica) remains (the ones the conspiratorial pupils were supposed to burn) were discovered in a landfill.

“[Just as] they start feeling like everything is OK and they have Annalise on their side and everything starting to seem like they could get away with this, of course the body is found,” Karla Souza, who plays the duplicitous and pragmatic Laurel Castillo, tells The Hollywood Reporter. “I got various calls from my family asking what the hell was going on because they thought that reveal would take a whole season.”

Read more‘How to Get Away With Murder’s’ Marcia Gay Harden: Hannah’s a “Bloodhound”

The discovery of Sam’s body was the latest twist in a season filled with countless OMG moments, and, according to Souza, things are only going to get “crazier.”

“The genius of the writers is that they’re not scared to write themselves into a corner and surprise us all, and they really keep this monster moving forward,” Souza said of the Pete Nowalk-led staff. “They’re really plowing through every extreme case and high circumstance that the students could take before they probably have a seizure.”

So what’s awaiting Laurel and the rest of the Keating Five over the few remaining episodes of its freshman run? Souza divulged that the tenuous relationships among the Keating Five will all be pushed to the breaking (up?) point.

“For all we know, behind the scenes, people could be doing things. You have no idea who you can trust,” the actress said, pointing out that group has already had to deal with some underhanded dealings with Connor (Jack Falahee) and Michaela (Aja Naomi King). “We really start to crumble and some of us are definitely going to crack.”

However, the careful balance of trust isn’t just fragile among the Keating cabal, but also with Annalise, as the students begin to wonder if their professor is really on their side or just saving herself. “What gave us that sort of breath of normalcy was the fact that Annalise, one of the best [criminal defense] attorneys we know, was on our side, and suddenly [it’s like] this one person — who you’ve seen win so many cases you thought she couldn’t win—could become our worst enemy,” she says.

Read more‘How to Get Away With Murder’ Postmortem: The Evidence Grows as the Keating Five Falter

So how will Laurel fare once the ish really starts to hit the fan?

“She’s proven herself to be really good in the high-stakes circumstances,” Souza admired of her character, who has grown from questioning her place at the firm and having Annalise not even know her name to taking charge and, as a fellow #TGIT character may say, handling the situation.

“Once you give Laurel some confidence, she can become a very strong, sort of pragmatic thinker,” said Souza, who previously studied acting in England and starred in movies in Mexico City before jumping to Murder. “She feels she can hold her own on the team and it’s not a question of whether or not it’s because of Frank (Charlie Weber) or not. She’s knows it’s because of her ability and because of the level that’s she’s reached and what’s she’s been able to prove.”

It’s this evolution, Souza says, that has pushed Laurel’s on-again, off-again relationship with the mysterious associate Frank into new territory.

“She’s really holding her ground, so that table is turning in a way which I feel gives [Laurel] more of an opportunity for an actual relationship, perhaps as adults, with Frank,” Souza said of the complicated back and forth between the two now that Frank no longer has an upper hand. “[Their] relationship could have purely been physical but now, in the next episode, you’ll see that it’s a meeting of the minds.”

A meeting of the minds might be exactly what Laurel and the rest of the team needs in these next few episodes as more than just Sam’s body hits the light of day.

While careful not to disclose too many secrets, Souza let slip that “another clue” is going to be found in those fateful woods, and there will be consequences.

“A surprising arrest happens that really changes everything,” she teased, “It’s going to be a shocking, shocking twister again for these [last few episodes.]”

Cheekily, she added: “The stakes get higher than ever.”

Excited for Thursday’s episode? Wondering what piece of evidence they find in the woods? Who is going to get arrested? Sound off in the comments below with your theories.

How to Get Away With Murder airs Thursdays at 10 p.m. on ABC.

Twitter: @NotPhelan

Continue Reading